Introduction

The case of Allcard v Skinner is a landmark decision of the English High Court of Justice that established the principle of an employer’s implied duty of care to provide a safe working environment for their employees.

The case arose from an accident that occurred in 1887 at the defendant’s printing works. The plaintiff, a young boy named Frederick Allcard, was injured when he fell into a vat of boiling water. The boy’s father, the plaintiff’s father, brought an action against the defendant, alleging that the defendant had been negligent in failing to provide a safe working environment.

The court found in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendant had breached his implied duty of care to provide a safe working environment and was therefore liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. This decision established the principle that employers have a duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of their employees, and it has been followed in subsequent cases.

Facts of the Case

In 1887, Frederick Allcard, a 12-year-old boy, was employed by the defendant, William Skinner, as a printer’s devil in his printing works. The boy’s job was to assist the printers with their work, including cleaning the presses and fetching type.

On the day of the accident, the boy was cleaning a printing press when he slipped and fell into a vat of boiling water. The boy was severely injured and was unable to work for a period of time. The boy’s father brought an action against the defendant, alleging that the defendant had been negligent in failing to provide a safe working environment.

Negligence and Breach of Duty

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant had been negligent in several ways. First, he argued that the defendant had failed to provide proper supervision for the boy. Second, he argued that the defendant had failed to provide adequate safety equipment, such as a guard rail around the vat of boiling water. Third, he argued that the defendant had failed to warn the boy of the dangers of working near the vat of boiling water.

The court agreed with the plaintiff’s arguments and found that the defendant had breached his duty of care to the plaintiff. The court held that the defendant had failed to take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of the boy, and was therefore liable for the boy’s injuries.

Significance of the Case

The case of Allcard v Skinner is a significant case in employment law because it established the principle of an employer’s implied duty of care to provide a safe working environment for their employees. This principle has since been followed in numerous other cases, and it is now a well-established principle of law.

The decision in Allcard v Skinner has had a major impact on the way that employers manage health and safety in the workplace. Employers are now required to take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of their employees, and they can be held liable for any injuries that occur as a result of their negligence.

Impact on Employer Liability

The decision in Allcard v Skinner has had a significant impact on employer liability. Employers are now required to take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of their employees, and they can be held liable for any injuries that occur as a result of their negligence.

This means that employers must take steps to identify and eliminate hazards in the workplace, and to provide their employees with adequate training and safety equipment. Employers must also supervise their employees to ensure that they are working safely.

Implications for Employers

The decision in Allcard v Skinner has important implications for employers. Employers must now take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of their employees, and they can be held liable for any injuries that occur as a result of their negligence.

This means that employers must:

  • Identify and eliminate hazards in the workplace
  • Provide employees with adequate training and safety equipment
  • Supervise employees to ensure that they are working safely

Defenses to an Allcard v Skinner Claim

There are a number of defenses that an employer may raise to an Allcard v Skinner claim. These defenses include:

  • The employee was contributorily negligent
  • The employer did not owe a duty of care to the employee
  • The employer took reasonable steps to ensure the safety of the employee

Conclusion

The case of Allcard v Skinner is a landmark decision in employment law that established the principle of an employer’s implied duty of care to provide a safe working environment for their employees. This principle has since been followed in numerous other cases, and it is now a well-established principle of law.

The decision in Allcard v Skinner has had a major impact on the way that employers manage health and safety in the workplace. Employers are now required to take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of their employees, and they can be held liable for any injuries that occur as a result of their negligence.

Tags:

Share:

Related Posts :

Leave a Comment